Video SEO

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 25 January 2007

A quick word about Googlebombs

Posted on 16:16 by Unknown
Co-written with Ryan Moulton and Kendra Carattini

We wanted to give a quick update about "Googlebombs." By improving our analysis of the link structure of the web, Google has begun minimizing the impact of many Googlebombs. Now we will typically return commentary, discussions, and articles about the Googlebombs instead. The actual scale of this change is pretty small (there are under a hundred well-known Googlebombs), but if you'd like to get more details about this topic, read on.

First off, let's back up and give some background. Unless you read all about search engines all day, you might wonder "What is a Googlebomb?" Technically, a "Googlebomb" (sometimes called a "linkbomb" since they're not specific to Google) refers to a prank where people attempt to cause someone else's site to rank for an obscure or meaningless query. Googlebombs very rarely happen for common queries, because the lack of any relevant results for that phrase is part of why a Googlebomb can work. One of the earliest Googlebombs was for the phrase "talentless hack," for example.

People have asked about how we feel about Googlebombs, and we have talked about them in the past. Because these pranks are normally for phrases that are well off the beaten path, they haven't been a very high priority for us. But over time, we've seen more people assume that they are Google's opinion, or that Google has hand-coded the results for these Googlebombed queries. That's not true, and it seemed like it was worth trying to correct that misperception. So a few of us who work here got together and came up with an algorithm that minimizes the impact of many Googlebombs.

The next natural question to ask is "Why doesn't Google just edit these search results by hand?" To answer that, you need to know a little bit about how Google works. When we're faced with a bad search result or a relevance problem, our first instinct is to look for an automatic way to solve the problem instead of trying to fix a particular search by hand. Algorithms are great because they scale well: computers can process lots of data very fast, and robust algorithms often work well in many different languages. That's what we did in this case, and the extra effort to find a good algorithm helps detect Googlebombs in many different languages. We wouldn't claim that this change handles every prank that someone has attempted. But if you are aware of other potential Googlebombs, we are happy to hear feedback in our Google Web Search Help Group.

Again, the impact of this new algorithm is very limited in scope and impact, but we hope that the affected queries are more relevant for searchers.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in search results | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Come see us at SES London and hear tips on successful site architecture
    If you're planning to be at Search Engine Strategies London February 13-15, stop by and say hi to one of the many Googlers who will be ...
  • All About Googlebot
    I've seen a lot of questions lately about robots.txt files and Googlebot's behavior. Last week at SES, I spoke on a new panel called...
  • Come and see us at Search Engine Strategies Chicago
    If you're planning to be at SES Chicago this week, be sure to stop by and say hi to the many Googlers who are coming out to brave the c...
  • Discover your links
    Update on October 15, 2008 : For more recent news on links, visit Links Week on our Webmaster Central Blog. We're discussing internal l...
  • Useful information you may have missed
    When we launched this blog in early August, we said goodbye to the Inside Google Sitemaps blog and started redirecting it here. The redirec...
  • Listen in - Matt Cutts and Vanessa Fox talk search
    Tune into Webmaster Radio Thursday, August 31 at 1 pm Pacific to hear Matt Cutts and me take over GoodKarma while GoodROI (Greg Nil...
  • Debugging blocked URLs
    Vanessa's been posting a lot lately, and I'm starting to feel left out. So here my tidbit of wisdom for you: I've noticed a cou...
  • About badware warnings
    Some of you have asked about the warnings we show searchers when they click on search results leading to sites that distribute malicious sof...
  • How to verify Googlebot
    Lately I've heard a couple smart people ask that search engines provide a way know that a bot is authentic. After all, any spammer cou...
  • Badware alerts for your sites
    As part of our efforts to protect users, we have been warning people using Google search before they visit sites that have been determined t...

Categories

  • crawling and indexing
  • events
  • feedback and communication
  • general tips
  • localization
  • products and services
  • search results
  • sitemaps
  • webmaster guidelines
  • webmaster tools

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (12)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ▼  January (3)
      • A quick word about Googlebombs
      • About badware warnings
      • The Year in Review
  • ►  2006 (34)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile